ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025
The effect of combined head and tail approach during laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection on pain severity and complications in patients with right colon cancer.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the impact of a combined craniocaudal approach on pain and complications during laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection in clients diagnosed with right colon cancer (RCC).
methods100 RCC patients were divided into Group A and Group B. Both groups underwent laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection, with Group A undergoing an intermediate approach and Group B undergoing a combined head and tail approach. Two groups of patients' perioperative (surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissection) indicators, postoperative recovery (postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospital stay, drainage tube removal time) indicators, perioperative pain level (VAS scores 1, 3, and 5 days following surgery), and incidence of complications (vascular injury, intestinal obstruction, anastomotic bleeding, incision infection), and the therapeutic efficacy [CEA, CA19-9] indicators were compared.
resultsClients in the B team had substantially shorter operating times and considerably fewer intraoperative hemorrhage than those in the A team. The VAS grades of clients in the B team were considerably lower than those in the A team the day following surgery. Clients in the B team experienced vascular injury at a substantially lower rate than those in the A team. The overall incidence rate of problems did not differ statistically significantly between the A team and the B team. Following therapy, teams A and B's CEA and CA19-9 levels were considerably lower than those of the same team prior to therapy.
conclusionCombined craniocaudal technique can significantly reduce intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, and the risk of sequelae from vascular injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38967738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.