ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2024
Field efficacy of a novel porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome modified-live virus vaccine with an emphasis on growth performance.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Field efficacy of a novel porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome modified-live virus vaccine with an emphasis on growth performance.Veterinary medicine and science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis field evaluation was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a new porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-2 (PRRSV-2) modified live virus vaccine at three independent pig farms.
methodsThree farms were selected for this study based on their respiratory disease status caused by PRRSV-2 infection in post-weaning and growing pigs. Each farm housed a total of 40, 18-day-old pigs that were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. Pigs were administered a 1.0 mL dose of the bivalent vaccine intramuscularly at 21 days of age in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, whereas unvaccinated pigs were administered a single dose of phosphate buffered saline at the same age.
resultsVaccinated groups were measured and calculated significantly (p < 0.05) higher in body weight and average daily weight gain on all three farms compared with unvaccinated groups. Vaccinated groups elicited PRRS antibodies and PRRSV-2-specific interferon-γ secreting cells, which reduced the amount of PRRSV-2 genomic copies in the blood and reduced macroscopic and microscopic lung lesions severity when compared with unvaccinated groups.
conclusionsThe field evaluation data demonstrated that a new PRRSV-2 modified live virus vaccine was efficacious in swine herds suffering from respiratory diseases caused by PRRSV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.