ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2024
Measurement of atmospheric amines and aminoamides by column adsorption/extraction and hydrophilic liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry.
Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sampling and chromatography-mass spectrometry methods were investigated to measure atmospheric amines and aminoamides. Amines and their amide derivatives play significant roles in new particle formation (NPF) in the atmosphere, especially diamines and aminoamides have higher NPF potentials compared to monoamines. For amine sampling, silica gel tube collection and formic acid extraction gave good overall recoveries (>93 ± 8%) for mono-, di-, tri-, tetramines, and aminoamides. Two chromatography methods were subjected to analyze the extracted amines. One involved direct analysis using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with carboxyl or diol group functioned separation column (carboxyl-HILIC or diol-HILIC), and the other utilized derivatization with 4-(N,N-dimethylaminosulfonyl)-7-fluoro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (DBD-F) and subsequent reversed-phase chromatography (HPLC). Separated amines were detected by electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry in both cases. DBD-F-HPLC method provided good sensitivity for mono- and all polyamines (limit of detection (LOD) < 4.6 nM, relative standard deviation (RSD) for 100 nM < 9.2%). However, aminoamides could not be detected by DBD-F-HPLC. Carboxyl-HILIC provided good sensitivities for mono- and diamines and aminoamides (LOD < 1.6 nM, RSD < 4.8%). Forest air measurement was performed and data obtained by carboxyl-HILIC and DBD-F-HPLC showed good agreement for 1,3-diaminopropane, 1,4-diaminobutane (putrescine) and 1,5-diaminopentane (cadaverine) (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
38967710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.