Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967702›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Equidae pythiosis in Brazil and the world: a systematic review of the last 63 years (1960-2023).

Daniela Isabel Brayer Pereira, Sônia Avila Botton, Lara Baccarin Ianiski, Caroline Quintana Braga, Aline Fontanella Maciel, Luíze Garcia Melo, Cristina Gomes Zambrano, Fábio Raphael Pascoti Bruhn, Janio Morais Santurio

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniela Isabel Brayer PereiraInstituto de Biologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. danielabrayer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-677X
Sônia Avila BottonCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Pesquisas Micológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-9217
Lara Baccarin IaniskiCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Pesquisas Micológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-3610
Caroline Quintana BragaInstituto de Biologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-9829
Aline Fontanella MacielCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Pesquisas Micológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9770-1932
Luíze Garcia MeloInstituto de Biologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5388-0799
Cristina Gomes ZambranoInstituto de Biologia, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Micologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-5681
Fábio Raphael Pascoti BruhnFaculdade de Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Janio Morais SanturioCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Laboratório de Pesquisas Micológicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6286-9076

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Financial code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review compiles reports of clinical pythiosis in horses, mules and donkeys from 1960 to 2023 worldwide, focusing on Brazil. We searched databases and included 71 articles detailing clinical characteristics, geographic distribution, epidemiology, diagnostic methods, therapies, and outcomes. The results showed that publications on equine pythiosis have significantly increased since 2010. Brazil reported the highest incidence, comprising 55% of cases, predominantly in the southern, northeastern, and central-western regions during summer and autumn. Cutaneous pythiosis was the most prevalent form, generally presenting as single lesions in the appendicular region, and affected females more than males. Diagnosis typically involved histopathology, used alone or with other methods. Various treatments have been employed, with surgery, often combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, being the most common. Notably, 80.84% of treated animals recovered, highlighting the effectiveness of these therapies in enhancing survival rates. The limitations of the study included the lack of data in published case reports, which made it difficult to collect and calculate epidemiological data. Additionally, we recognize that pythiosis in Brazil is underreported, since this disease does not have mandatory notification and several cases are not registered and/or reported in the literature. Lastly, it is hypothesized that equid pythiosis may be more widespread than currently known, and its real occurrence in Brazil remains uncertain.

Indexed as

Horse DiseasesPythiosisAnimalsBrazilFemaleHistory, 21st CenturyHorsesMalePythiumClinical featureDiagnosisEpidemiologyHorseInfectious diseaseOomycotaPythium InsidiosumTherapy

Identifiers

PMID38967702
PMCPMC11405592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.