Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967672›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Local adjuncts to minimally invasive endoscopic interventions for benign laryngotracheal stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Wei Ming, Jingjing Zuo, Jibo Han, Jinhui Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Speech and language therapy management of laryngotracheal stenosis - what has changed.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei Ming *Department of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. mw_mingwei@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-0377
Jingjing Zuo *Department of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jibo HanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jinhui ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenign laryngotracheal stenosis is widely managed with minimally invasive endoscopic interventions, such as laser incision or excision scar, and dilation. However, various endoscopic treatments are significantly associated with a high recurrence rate. Local auxiliary measures, including inhalation of steroids, injection of steroids, and local topical application of mitomycin C, have been studied in order to increase the success rate. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic treatments with and without local adjuncts in patients with benign laryngotracheal stenosis, and analyze their clinical outcomes, recurrence, and complications.

methodsIn the meta-analysis, databases including PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, and Web of Science were searched for papers comparing the outcomes of adjunct therapy with non-adjunct therapy in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis. The duplicate publications, reviews, comments or letters, conference abstracts, and case reports were excluded. The random effect model was used for assessing the pooled risk estimates.

resultsEight studies (1204 cases) referring to two prospective randomized controlled studies, two prospective cohort studies, and four retrospective cohort studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Three delivery modes of adjuncts were identified, including intralesion steroid injection (n = 2), inhaled steroid (n = 2), and topical application of mitomycin C (n = 4). The decreased risk estimates of recurrence rate were detected in patients receiving endoscopic treatments with steroid injection or inhaled steroid, compared with endoscopic interventions alone (P < 0.05). Additionally, patients undergoing adjunct therapies had lower risk estimates of recurrence, compared to those receiving endoscopic procedures alone (P < 0.05), based on the subgroup of prospective cohort studies, subglottis, Mayer-Cotton scale of I-II degree, and stenosis length of < 3 cm. The high heterogeneity of the pooling risk estimates perhaps was due to factors of auxiliary drug, clinical characteristics of patients, and methodology. No discernible difference in the incidence of complication was identified.

conclusionsLocal application of steroids to minimally invasive interventions appear to reduce the recurrence rate of laryngotracheal stenosis. Various adjuncts available, including steroids and mitomycin C, appear to be safe and associated with a low risk estimate of adjuncts-specific complication rate. High quality multi-center randomized controlled studies are needed, with sufficient periods for follow-up and subjective and objective outcome indicators, to properly evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of adjuvant drugs.

Indexed as

LaryngostenosisMitomycinTracheal StenosisAdministration, InhalationEndoscopyHumansLaryngoscopyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeMitomycinAdjunctsEndoscopic interventionsLaryngotracheal stenosisMeta-analysisRecurrence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.