Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967540›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2024

Global Financing Facility investments for vulnerable populations: content analysis regarding maternal and newborn health and stillbirths in 11 African countries, 2015 to 2019.

Mary Kinney, Meghan Bruce Kumar, Issa Kaboré, Joël Kiendrébéogo, Peter Waiswa, Joy E Lawn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary KinneySchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Meghan Bruce KumarDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Nothumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-8328
Issa KaboréOperations Division, Research, Expertise and Training Department, Recherche Pour la Santé et le Développement (RESADE, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Joël KiendrébéogoDepartment of Research, Expertise and Capacity Building, Research, Expertise and Training Department, Recherche Pour la Santé et le Développement (RESADE), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0002-7000-3712
Peter WaiswaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-9868-0515
Joy E LawnDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4573-1443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Financing Facility (GFF) was launched in 2015 to catalyse increased domestic and external financing for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, adolescent health, and nutrition. Half of the deaths along this continuum are neonatal deaths, stillbirths or maternal deaths; yet these topics receive the least aid financing across the continuum.

objectivesTo conduct a policy content analysis of maternal and newborn health (MNH), including stillbirths, in GFF country planning documents, and assess the mortality burden related to the investment.

methodsContent analysis was conducted on 24 GFF policy documents, investment cases and project appraisal documents (PADs), from 11 African countries. We used a systematic data extraction approach and applied a framework for analysis considering mindset, measures, and money for MNH interventions and mentions of mortality outcomes. We compared PAD investments to MNH-related deaths by country.

resultsFor these 11 countries, USD$1,894 million of new funds were allocated through the PADs, including USD$303 million (16%) from GFF. All documents had strong content on MNH, with particular focus on pregnancy and childbirth interventions. The investment cases commonly included comprehensive results frameworks, and PADs generally had less technical content and fewer indicators. Mortality outcomes were mentioned, especially for maternal. Stillbirths were rarely included as targets. Countries had differing approaches to funding descriptions. PAD allocations are commensurate with the burden.

conclusionsThe GFF country plans present a promising start in addressing MNH. Emphasising links between investments and burden, explicitly including stillbirth, and highlighting high-impact packages, as appropriate, could potentially increase impact.

Indexed as

Infant HealthStillbirthVulnerable PopulationsAfricaFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInvestmentsMaternal HealthMaternal MortalityPregnancyGlobal Financing Facility for Women, Children and Adolescents: Examining National Priorities, Processes and Investmentshealth financingMaternalneonatalnewbornpolicy analysispregnancystillbirth

Identifiers

PMID38967540
PMCPMC11229757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.