ArticleChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)2024
Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Applications of digital health technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms in COPD: systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- AI/ML driven prediction of COPD exacerbations and readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Development and multicenter validation of machine learning models for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive models for mortality readmission events and cardiovascular complications in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Model Based on Routine Admission Laboratory Tests for Predicting New-Onset Hypoalbuminemia in Hospitalized Older Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- From Logistic Regression to Foundation Models: Factors Associated With Improved Forecasts.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This present work focused on predicting prognostic outcomes of inpatients developing acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and enhancing patient monitoring and treatment by using objective clinical indicators. Methods: The present retrospective study enrolled 322 AECOPD patients. Registry data downloaded based on the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Pay-for-Performance Program database from January 2012 to December 2018 were used to check whether the enrolled patients were eligible. Our primary and secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality, respectively. The best feature subset was chosen by recursive feature elimination. Moreover, 7 machine learning (ML) models were trained for forecasting ICU admission among AECOPD patients, and the model with the most excellent performance was used. Results: According to our findings, a random forest (RF) model showed superb discrimination performance, and the values of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.973 and 0.828 in training and test cohorts, separately. Additionally, according to decision curve analysis, the net benefit of the RF model was higher when differentiating patients with a high risk of ICU admission at a <0.55 threshold probability. Moreover, the ML-based prediction model was also constructed to predict in-hospital mortality, and it showed excellent calibration and discrimination capacities. Conclusion: The ML model was highly accurate in assessing the ICU admission and in-hospital mortality risk for AECOPD cases. Maintenance of model interpretability helped effectively provide accurate and lucid risk prediction of different individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.