ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2024
Ovarian function in female survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of cancer treatment on fertility in female childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- From subclinical ovarian damage to reproductive outcomes: a translational perspective on PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and management of neuroblastoma in children.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionData on ovarian function in neuroblastoma survivors are limited. We sought to determine the prevalence of ovarian dysfunction in a cohort of high-risk neuroblastoma survivors and compare outcomes among survivors treated with and without autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) preceded by myeloablative chemotherapy.
methodsRetrospective review of female survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma ≥5 years from diagnosis, diagnosed between 1982 and 2014, and followed in a tertiary cancer center. Participants were divided into two groups: individuals treated with conventional chemotherapy ± radiation ("non-ASCR") (n = 32) or with chemotherapy ± radiation followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with ASCR ("ASCR") (n = 51). Ovarian dysfunction was defined as follicle-stimulating hormone ≥15 mU/mL, while premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) was defined as persistent ovarian dysfunction requiring hormone replacement therapy. Poisson models were used to determine prevalence ratios of ovarian dysfunction and POI.
resultsAmong 83 females (median attained age: 19 years [range, 10-36]; median follow-up: 15 years [range, 7-36]), 49 (59%) had ovarian dysfunction, and 34 (41%) developed POI. Survivors treated with ASCR were 3.2-fold more likely to develop ovarian dysfunction (95% CI: 1.8-6.0; p < 0.001) and 4.5-fold more likely to develop POI (95% CI: 1.7-11.7; p = 0.002) when compared with those treated with conventional chemotherapy, after adjusting for attained age. Two participants in the non-ASCR group and six in the ASCR group achieved at least one spontaneous pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Ovarian dysfunction is prevalent in female high-risk neuroblastoma survivors, especially after ASCR. Longitudinal follow-up of larger cohorts is needed to inform counseling about the risk of impaired ovarian function after neuroblastoma therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.