ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Identification of the binding proteins of organic acid metabolites by matrix thermal shift assay].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Label-Free Target Discovery Strategy for Natural Active Products.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organic acid metabolites exhibit acidic properties. These metabolites serve as intermediates in major carbon metabolic pathways and are involved in several biochemical pathways, including the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and glycolysis. They also regulate cellular activity and play crucial roles in epigenetics, tumorigenesis, and cellular signal transduction. Knowledge of the binding proteins of organic acid metabolites is crucial for understanding their biological functions. However, identifying the binding proteins of these metabolites has long been a challenging task owing to the transient and weak nature of their interactions. Moreover, traditional methods are unsuitable for the structural modification of the ligands of organic acid metabolites because these metabolites have simple and similar structures. Even minor structural modifications can significantly affect protein interactions. Thermal proteome profiling (TPP) provides a promising avenue for identifying binding proteins without the need for structural modifications. This approach has been successfully applied to the identification of the binding proteins of several metabolites. In this study, we investigated the binding proteins of two TCA cycle intermediates, i.e., succinate and fumarate, and lactate, an end-product of glycolysis, using the matrix thermal shift assay (mTSA) technique. This technique involves combining single-temperature (52 ℃) TPP and dose-response curve analysis to identify ligand-binding proteins with high levels of confidence and determine the binding affinity between ligands and proteins. To this end, HeLa cells were lysed, followed by protein desalting to remove endogenous metabolites from the cell lysates. The desalted cell lysates were treated with fumarate or succinate at final concentrations of 0.004, 0.04, 0.4, and 2 mmol/L in the experimental groups or 2 mmol/L sodium chloride in the control group. Considering that the cellular concentration of lactate can be as high as 2-30 mmol/L, we then applied lactate at final concentrations of 0.2, 1, 5, 10, and 25 mmol/L in the experimental groups or 25 mmol/L sodium chloride in the control group. Using high-sensitivity mass spectrometry coupled with data-independent acquisition (DIA) quantification, we quantified 5870, 5744, and 5816 proteins in succinate, fumarate, and lactate mTSA experiments, respectively. By setting stringent cut-off values (i.e., significance of changes in protein thermal stability (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.