Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966804›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Treatment for Low-volume Metastatic Seminoma in a Population-based Cohort: The Swedish Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group Experience.

Anna Thor, Helene F S Negaard, Anna Grenabo Bergdahl, Bjarte Almås, Signe Melsen Larsen, Per-Olof Lundgren, Axel Gerdtsson, Dag Halvorsen, Berglind Johannsdottir, Anna K Jansson and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07498959 (Testicular Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07498959 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Testicular Cancer Treatment: Assessing Quality of Life in Good Prognosis Metastastic Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorSahlgrenska University HospitalRan2026 to 2032Enrolled160ConditionsTesticular Cancer, Seminoma, Quality of Life, De-escalationArmsprimary RPLND for low-stage metasatatic seminoma, 3 courses of chemotherapy, Blemocin, Etoposide and Platinum (BEP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Anna ThorDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helene F S NegaardDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anna Grenabo BergdahlDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bjarte AlmåsDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Signe Melsen LarsenDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Per-Olof LundgrenDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Axel GerdtssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dag HalvorsenDepartment of Urology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Berglind JohannsdottirDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna K JanssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Martin HellströmDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Rolf WahlqvistDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Carl W LangbergThe Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Annika HedlundDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Olof AkreDepartment of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingrid GlimeliusDepartment of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Olof StåhlDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Hege Sagstuen HaugnesDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Gabriella Cohn-CedermarkDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders KjellmanDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Torgrim TandstadThe Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: There is an unmet need to avoid long-term morbidity associated with standard cytotoxic treatment for low-volume metastatic seminoma. Our aim was to assess the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as treatment in a population-based cohort of metastatic seminoma patients with limited retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Methods: Sixty-two seminoma patients in Norway and Sweden were included in the cohort from 2019 to 2022. Patients with lymphadenopathy ≤3 cm, having primary clinical stage (CS) IIA/B or CS I with a relapse, were operated with uni- or bilateral template RPLND, open or robot assisted. The outcome measures included surgical complications as per Clavien-Dindo, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for 24-mo progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Key findings and limitations: In the cohort, 33 (53%) had CS I with a relapse during surveillance, six (10%) CS I with a relapse following adjuvant chemotherapy, and 23 (37%) initial CS IIA/B. Metastatic seminoma was verified in 58 patients (94%) with a median largest diameter of 18 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 13-24). Robot-assisted RPLND was performed in 40 patients (65%). Clavien-Dindo III complications were observed in three patients (5%); no grade ≥IV complications occurred. Eighteen patients (29%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The median follow-up was 23 mo (IQR 16-30), and recurrence occurred in six patients (10%) after a median of 8 mo (IQR 4-14). PFS was 90% (95% confidence interval: 0.86-1) and OS was 100% at 24 mo. Conclusions and clinical implications: RPLND as primary treatment is an option for selected low-stage seminomas with a limited burden of disease, showing low complications and low relapse rates, with the potential to reduce long-term morbidity. Patient summary: In seminoma patients with limited metastatic spread, surgery is a treatment option offering an alternative to chemotherapy or radiation. This paper covers the first 62 patients operated in Norway and Sweden.

Indexed as

Germ cell cancerMetastaticRetroperitonealRetroperitoneal lymph node dissectionRobotic surgerySeminomaTesticular

Identifiers

PMID38966804
PMCPMC11222926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.