Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966798›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2024

Understanding consumer preferences to develop dahi using pineapple pomace powder and monk-fruit extract.

Sparsh Gumber, Shiv Kumar, Rekha Kaushik, Harish Kumar, Rahul Mehra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sparsh GumberMaharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana India.
Shiv KumarMaharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana India.
Rekha KaushikMaharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana India.
Harish KumarShri Vishwakarma Skill University, Palwal, Haryana India.
Rahul MehraMaharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana India.ORCID 0000-0003-0299-4443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer preferences refer to the subjective assessments of products and services expressed by individuals. The objective of this investigation aims to examine the preferences of consumers regarding dahi, followed by the development of a corresponding product. The initial phase of the experimental design involves understanding the interests of consumers and the variables that influence their purchasing intentions through the administration of a questionnaire. The subsequent phase entails the development of dahi in accordance with consumer preferences, followed by an assessment of its nutritional value, sensory acceptability, and storage study. Subsequently, a significant proportion of consumers (91%) expressed an interest for the introduction of a pineapple-flavour (61.5%) spoon-able dahi (77%) containing natural sugar (65%) and packaged in a cup (71.5%) within the market. To adjust the sweetness intensity of monk fruit, a series of preliminary experiments were carried out to regulate the concentration to a level that can be considered sensory acceptable, specifically 05 g/100 ml. Afterwards, dahi was prepared by altering the concentration of FPP (freeze-dried pine-apple pomace powder) within the range of 0.5 to 2.5 g/100 ml. Prepared dahi were further subjected to sensory evaluation and storage study. Based on the obtained results and sensory analyst feedback, we conclude that the dahi formulation TPM2 exhibits considerable organoleptic acceptance and also has the potential for industrial-scale production to cater wider consumer demands. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13197-023-05919-5.

Indexed as

Consumer preferenceDahiMonk fruitPine-apple pomace powder

Identifiers

PMID38966798
PMCPMC11219624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.