ArticleIJU case reports2024
Initial experience of enfortumab vedotin in a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma on hemodialysis: Two case reports.
Article in IJU case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Enfortumab Vedotin by Trial Eligibility in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in 2 Hemodialysis Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Series.Case reports in oncologyArticle
- Safety of Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Hemodialysis Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Case Report.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Few studies have reported on administering enfortumab vedotin to patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. Case presentation: Case 1: An 85-year-old man underwent hemodialysis for progressive renal failure 4 months after right laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Case 2: A 73-year-old man underwent hemodialysis after two laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomies for recurrent urothelial carcinoma. In both cases, enfortumab vedotin was administered due to postoperative recurrence and progression despite platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. Partial response and disease progression were observed in cases 1 and 2, respectively. Adverse events included a mild skin rash in both patients and neutropenia in Case 1, both of which resolved with symptomatic treatment. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis, were confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.