ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
SWI and CTP fusion model based on sparse representation method to predict cerebral infarction trend.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomics and ischemic stroke research: bibliometric insights and visual trends (2004-2024).Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: SWI image signal is related to venous reflux disorder and perfusion defect. Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) contains perfusion information in space and time. There is a complementary basis between them to affect the prognosis of cerebral infarction. Methods: Sixty-six patients included in the retrospective study were designated as the training set. Effective perfusion indicator features and imaging radiomic features of the peri-infarction area on Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) and CTP modality images were extracted from each case. Thirty-three patients from the prospectively included group were designated as the test set of the machine learning model based on a sparse representation method. The predicted results were compared with the DWI results of the patients' 7-10 days review to assess the validity and accuracy of the prediction. Results: The AUC of the SWI + CTP integrated model was 0.952, the ACC was 0.909, the SEN was 0.889, and the SPE was 0.933. The prediction performance is the highest. Compared with the value of AUC: the SWI model is 0.874, inferior to the performance of the SWI + CTP model, and the CTP model is 0.715. Conclusion: The prediction efficiency of the changing trend of infarction volume is further improved by the correlation between the combination of the two image features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.