ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
NoC simulation steered by NEST: McAERsim and a Noxim patch.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NoC simulation steered by NEST: McAERsim and a Noxim patch.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Great knowledge was gained about the computational substrate of the brain, but the way in which components and entities interact to perform information processing still remains a secret. Complex and large-scale network models have been developed to unveil processes at the ensemble level taking place over a large range of timescales. They challenge any kind of simulation platform, so that efficient implementations need to be developed that gain from focusing on a set of relevant models. With increasing network sizes imposed by these models, low latency inter-node communication becomes a critical aspect. This situation is even accentuated, if slow processes like learning should be covered, that require faster than real-time simulation. Methods: Therefore, this article presents two simulation frameworks, in which network-on-chip simulators are interfaced with the neuroscientific development environment NEST. This combination yields network traffic that is directly defined by the relevant neural network models and used to steer the network-on-chip simulations. As one of the outcomes, instructive statistics on network latencies are obtained. Since time stamps of different granularity are used by the simulators, a conversion is required that can be exploited to emulate an intended acceleration factor. Results: By application of the frameworks to scaled versions of the cortical microcircuit model-selected because of its unique properties as well as challenging demands-performance curves, latency, and traffic distributions could be determined. Discussion: The distinct characteristic of the second framework is its tree-based source-address driven multicast support, which, in connection with the torus topology, always led to the best results. Although currently biased by some inherent assumptions of the network-on-chip simulators, the results suit well to those of previous work dealing with node internals and suggesting accelerated simulations to be in reach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.