ArticleData in brief2024
Dataset on the impact of implementing a shared governance model on the level of professional governance among nurses in Saudi Arabia: Insights from experimental data.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared governance is a concept that has been gaining popularity in the nursing field. It is a framework that allows nurses to have a greater role in clinical decision-making. This approach recognizes the expertise and knowledge that nurses possess and allows them to be active participants in the decision-making process. It is a way to empower nurses and to ensure that the best possible care is being provided to patients. By promoting shared governance, nurses are able to work collaboratively with other healthcare professionals and provide high-quality care that is evidence-based and patient-centered. This article presents data that was collected in an empirical study to investigate the impact of implementing a shared governance model on the perceptions of professional governance among nurses working in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia by measuring the level of shared governance from the lowest level, the traditional governance level (management and administration only), to the highest level, the self-governance level (staff only), through six dimensions of nursing professional governance, including personnel, information, resources, participation, practice, and goals. The study was conducted over 8 months between July 2022 to February 2023 with the involvement of a random sample of 200 clinical nurses who completed a structured questionnaire before and after the study interventions as part of quasi-research. The interventions included designing and implementing a shared governance model, and providing a shared governance training to clinical to nurse participants. The pretest-posttest experimental group showed that there were improvements in the level of shared governance (shared governance level - primarily management/administration with some staff input), which denotes the effectiveness of nursing professionals governance training among nurses working in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The data used in this study can be utilized by future studies for benchmarking purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.