Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Personalized chemotherapy selection for patients with triple-negative breast cancer using deep learning.

Xinyi Yang, Reshetov Iogr Vladmirovich, Poltavskaya Maria Georgievna, Agakina Yulia Sergeevna, Mingze He, Zitong Zeng, Yinpeng Qiang, Yu Cao, Kulikov Timur Sergeevich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xinyi Yang *I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Reshetov Iogr Vladmirovich *I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Poltavskaya Maria Georgievna *I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Agakina Yulia SergeevnaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Mingze HeInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Zitong ZengI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Yinpeng QiangI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Yu CaoDepartment of Faculty Surgery No. 2, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Kulikov Timur SergeevichI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Potential uncertainties and overtreatment exist in adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Objectives: This study aims to explore the performance of deep learning (DL) models in personalized chemotherapy selection and quantify the impact of baseline characteristics on treatment efficacy. Methods: Patients who received treatment recommended by models were compared to those who did not. Overall survival for treatment according to model recommendations was the primary outcome. To mitigate bias, inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed. A mixed-effect multivariate linear regression was employed to visualize the influence of certain baseline features of patients on chemotherapy selection. Results: A total of 10,070 female TNBC patients met the inclusion criteria. Treatment according to Self-Normalizing Balanced (SNB) individual treatment effect for survival data model recommendations was associated with a survival benefit (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.32-8.60; IPTW-adjusted risk difference: 12.90, 95% CI, 6.99-19.01; IPTW-adjusted the difference in restricted mean survival time: 5.54, 95% CI, 1.36-8.61), which surpassed other models and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. No survival benefit for chemotherapy was seen for patients not recommended to receive this treatment. SNB predicted older patients with larger tumors and more positive lymph nodes are the optimal candidates for chemotherapy. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the SNB model may identify patients with TNBC who could benefit from chemotherapy. This novel analytical approach may provide debiased individual survival information and treatment recommendations. Further research is required to validate these models in clinical settings with more features and outcome measurements.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapycausal inferencechemotherapydeep learningtriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38966532
PMCPMC11222643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.