Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966521›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2024

The disutility of compartmental model forecasts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tarini Sudhakar, Ashna Bhansali, John Walkington, David Puelz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tarini SudhakarSalem Center for Policy, Department of Finance, & Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, Austin, TX, United States.
Ashna BhansaliSalem Center for Policy, Department of Finance, & Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, Austin, TX, United States.
John WalkingtonSalem Center for Policy, Department of Finance, & Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, Austin, TX, United States.
David PuelzSalem Center for Policy, Department of Finance, & Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, several forecasting models were released to predict the spread of the virus along variables vital for public health policymaking. Of these, the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) compartmental model was the most common. In this paper, we investigated the forecasting performance of The University of Texas COVID-19 Modeling Consortium SIR model. We considered the following daily outcomes: hospitalizations, ICU patients, and deaths. We evaluated the overall forecasting performance, highlighted some stark forecast biases, and considered forecast errors conditional on different pandemic regimes. We found that this model tends to

Indexed as

compartmental modelsCOVID-19pandemic surveillanceSEIRSIR

Identifiers

PMID38966521
PMCPMC11222405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.