ArticleCureus2024
Laparoscopic Management of a 12-Week Pregnancy Loss in a Rudimentary Uterine Horn.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn is a rare structural uterine anomaly resulting from incomplete Mullerian duct development and/or fusion. Pregnancy in rudimentary horn is an uncommon presentation of a Mullerian anomaly and may lead to substantial morbidity and mortality due to high risk of uterine rupture with intraabdominal hemorrhage. Medical and/or surgical management may be undertaken; however, currently, no treatment guidelines exist. We describe the management of a 12-week rudimentary horn pregnancy in a 25-year-old multiparous patient with a prior spontaneous preterm breech vaginal delivery and one spontaneous early term cephalic vaginal delivery in whom this congenital uterine condition was previously unknown. The rudimentary horn, nonviable pregnancy, and contiguous ipsilateral fallopian tube were excised laparoscopically without complication. Given the infrequency of rudimentary horn pregnancies and the high risk for obstetric complications, a high index of suspicion should be maintained. We emphasize that a history of preterm birth or malpresentation should raise suspicion for maternal Mullerian anomaly, and that a minimally invasive approach can be feasible for treatment of a rudimentary horn pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.