Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966382›Full record

ArticleChemical science2024

Maleimide functionalized polycaprolactone micelles for glutathione quenching and doxorubicin delivery.

Godwin K Babanyinah, Abhi Bhadran, Himanshu Polara, Hanghang Wang, Tejas Shah, Michael C Biewer, Mihaela C Stefan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Godwin K BabanyinahDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.
Abhi BhadranDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.
Himanshu PolaraDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-9518
Hanghang WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.
Tejas ShahDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.
Michael C BiewerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-6341
Mihaela C StefanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas Richardson TX USA mihaela@utdallas.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-4635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High glutathione production is known to be one of the defense mechanisms by which many cancer cells survive elevated oxidative stress. By explicitly targeting glutathione in these cancer cells and diminishing its levels, oxidative stress can be intensified, ultimately triggering apoptosis or programmed cell death. Herein, we developed a novel approach by creating maleimide-functionalized polycaprolactone polymers, specifically using 2,3-diiodomaleimide functionality to reduce the level of glutathione in cancer cells. Polycaprolactone was chosen to conjugate the 2,3-diiodomaleimide functionality due to its biodegradable and biocompatible properties. The amphiphilic block copolymer was synthesized using PEG as a macroinitiator to make corresponding polymeric micelles. The resulting 2,3-diiodomaleimide-conjugated polycaprolactone micelles effectively quenched glutathione, even at low concentrations (0.01 mg mL

Identifiers

PMID38966382
PMCPMC11220601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.