ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
A proof-of-principle study for the point-of-care detection of ESBL (CTX-M) by NG-Test
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of three immunochromatographic assays for the rapid detection of CTX-M in Enterobacterales.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) in low- and middle-income countries limits treatment options, leading to the frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Reducing time-to-result for a urinary infection can facilitate correct antibiotic treatment and support antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship measures. This study compared two simplified enrichment methods for detecting CTX-M directly from urine specimens. Methods: Two enrichment methods, namely centrifugation of 2 mL urine and filtration of 1 mL urine using the DirecTool adaptor, were compared using 20 culture-positive urine samples (20 suspected ESBL-E and 20 non-ESBL-E). CTX-M production was detected using a lateral flow assay (LFA), NG-Test Results: The results of both enrichment methods were identical, with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 100%. In 19/20 (95%) of the urine samples, the results of the CTX-M LFA were identical with the phenotypic confirmation and WGS. Both methods could detect ESBL-E bacteriuria with ≥10 Conclusions: Our study underscores the feasibility of directly detecting CTX-M in urine. Simplified enrichment methods, particularly with a filtration kit, enhance the assay's practicality, rendering it suitable for use in primary care, emergency departments or remote laboratories without sophisticated equipment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.