Review in Endoscopy international open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Luiza Bicudo de OliveiraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7959-8313
Mateus Pereira FunariGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4828-9320
Angelo So Taa KumGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2626-8235
Alexandre de Moraes BestettiGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor Ottoboni BrunaldiGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3315-8640
Tomazo Antonio Prince FranziniGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Luiza Martins BaroniGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus Ferreira de CarvalhoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Wanderley Marques BernardoGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8597-5207
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8023-3722
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Pure cut vs. Endocut in endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. · full record | OpenQuestion