Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966257›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2024

Social Justice and the Political Organization of Behavior Analysts: Changing the Institutional Practices of a Brazilian Association.

Izadora Ribeiro Perkoski, Liane Jorge de Souza Dahás, Luana Flor Tavares Hamilton, Bernardo Dutra Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Izadora Ribeiro PerkoskiDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Rod. Washington Luiz, São Carlos, SP 13565-905 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-4905
Liane Jorge de Souza DahásInstitute of Psychology, São Paulo University (USP), Avenida Professor Mello de Morais, 1721, Butantã, São Paulo, SP 05508-030 Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-1219
Luana Flor Tavares HamiltonDepartment of Psychology, Ruy Barbosa College (UniRuy-Wyden), Rua Theodomiro Baptista, 422, Rio Vermelho, Salvador, BA 41940-320 Brazil.
Bernardo Dutra RodriguesParadigma Center for Sciences and Technology of Behavior (Paradigma), R. Vanderlei, 611, Perdizes, São Paulo, SP 05011-001 Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the advancement of behavioral research in culture and social behavior, it seems natural for the community of behavior analysts to progress towards increased political engagement and a dedication to social justice. To reach this goal, it is necessary to act inside one's own communities and organizations. The purpose of this article is to report on the efforts of the Brazilian Association for Behavioral Psychology and Medicine (ABPMC) to increase equity and social justice during the 2017-2018 term. First, we present an overview of the ABPMC. Next, we describe the process of identifying, planning, and implementing equity and social justice actions in the association. The problems targeted were the discontinuation of policies from one term to another, elitism and centralization, the lack of topics with social and political relevance in the annual conference's scientific program, and the lack of support for the participation of women (especially mothers) in clinical and academic practice. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-020-00510-2.

Indexed as

Human rightsinclusionProfessional associationScientific conferenceSocial justice

Identifiers

PMID38966257
PMCPMC11219653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.