Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966189›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Identifying and synthesizing components of perinatal mental health peer support - a systematic review.

Laura Hölzle, Philipp Schöch, Christine Hörtnagl, Anna Buchheim, Astrid Lampe, Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss, Jean Lillian Paul

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura HölzleDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University Innsbruck, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp SchöchDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University Innsbruck, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christine HörtnaglDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University Innsbruck, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anna BuchheimUniversity of Innsbruck, Institute of Psychology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Astrid LampeLudwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft Institute for Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria.
Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss *Austrian Institute of Health Technology Assessment, Vienna, Austria.
Jean Lillian Paul *Department of Psychiatry, Medical University Innsbruck, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Becoming a parent, while often perceived as a joyous event, can also be a vulnerable life transition, with approximately one in five mothers experiencing perinatal mental illness. Peer support is recommended for its preventive and therapeutic benefits. However, relevant program components of perinatal mental health peer support remain to be identified. Objectives: This review aims to (1) identify peer support programs in perinatal mental health through existing reviews and to (2) synthesize the components of these programs. Methods: A systematic literature review guided by PRISMA was conducted searching four databases, supplemented by hand searches. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist facilitated the systematic extraction and synthesis of program components. Results: Eleven peer support programs were identified from three reviews, largely conducted in English-speaking countries. The identified reviews highlight the benefits of peer support in perinatal mental health. Key components of individual programs were contextual background, materials, provider training and support, delivery modes and locations, and evaluation. Sharing lived experience and providing flexible support were central to all programs. Conclusion: Aspects of flexibility, authenticity and the challenges of program evaluation in peer support must be considered. Findings can now inform future planning and implementation efforts of peer support programs in periantal mental health.

Indexed as

lived experienceparental mental illnesspeer supportperinatal mental healthsocial support

Identifiers

PMID38966189
PMCPMC11223205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.