Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966117›Full record

ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2024

Finding the place for nutrition in healthcare education and practice.

Ebiambu Agwara, Kathy Martyn, Elaine Macaninch, Wanja Nyaga, Luke Buckner, Breanna Lepre, Celia Laur, Sumantra Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ebiambu Agwara *NNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5048-2939
Kathy Martyn *NNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2920-9847
Elaine MacaninchNNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.
Wanja NyagaNNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.
Luke BucknerNNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-4880
Breanna LepreNNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0154-1960
Celia LaurNNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4555-1407
Sumantra RayNNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3295-168X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition continues to impact healthcare outcomes, quality of life and costs to healthcare systems. The implementation of nutrition care in healthcare practice may improve health outcomes for patients and the community. This paper describes the iterative development and implementation of nutrition medical education resources for doctors and healthcare professionals in England. These resources are part of the Nutrition Education Policy for Healthcare Practice initiative. Method: Action research methodology was employed to develop and implement nutrition education workshops for medical students and doctors. The workshop was developed iteratively by an interdisciplinary project team, and the content was initially based on the General Medical Council outcomes for graduates. It was evaluated using quantitative evaluation tools and informal qualitative feedback captured from attendees using tools provided by the host organisations and developed by the roadshow team. Results: A total of 6 nutrition education workshops were delivered to 169 participants. This simple educational package demonstrated potential for delivery in different healthcare settings; however, formal feedback was difficult to obtain. Evaluation results indicate that workshops were better received when delivered by doctors known to the participants and included local context and examples. Reported barriers to the workshops included difficulty for participants in finding the time to attend, beliefs that peers gave a low priority to nutrition and uncertainty about professional roles in the delivery of nutrition care. Conclusion: A key outcome of this project was the development of resources for nutrition training of doctors, adapted to local needs. However, relatively low attendance and multiple barriers faced in the delivery of these workshops highlight that there is no ideal 'place' for nutrition training in current healthcare teaching. Interprofessional education, through relevant clinical scenarios may increase awareness of the importance of nutrition in healthcare, support the alignment of health professional roles and improve subsequent knowledge and skills.

Indexed as

nutrition assessment

Identifiers

PMID38966117
PMCPMC11221274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.