Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966071›Full record

ArticleNational science review2024

Human CD56

Wentong Jia, Liyang Ma, Xin Yu, Feiyang Wang, Qian Yang, Xiaoye Wang, Mengjie Fan, Yan Gu, Ran Meng, Jian Wang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wentong JiaState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Liyang MaState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Xin YuState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-9030
Feiyang WangState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-5497
Qian YangNHC Key Lab of Reproduction Regulation, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Reproductive Health Drug and Devices, Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, Shanghai 200237, China.
Xiaoye WangNational Clinical Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Mengjie FanNational Clinical Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Yan GuDepartment of Family Planning, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Ran MengDepartment of Prenatal Screening, Haidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.
Jian WangNHC Key Lab of Reproduction Regulation, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Reproductive Health Drug and Devices, Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, Shanghai 200237, China.
Yuxia LiState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Rong LiNational Clinical Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-5579
Xuan ShaoState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-1648
Yan-Ling WangState Key Laboratory of Stem cell and Reproductive Biology, Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-7803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decidual natural killer (dNK) cells are the most abundant immune cells at the maternal-fetal interface during early pregnancy in both mice and humans, and emerging single-cell transcriptomic studies have uncovered various human dNK subsets that are disrupted in patients experiencing recurrent early pregnancy loss (RPL) at early gestational stage, suggesting a connection between abnormal proportions or characteristics of dNK subsets and RPL pathogenesis. However, the functional mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. Here, we established a mouse model by adoptively transferring human dNK cells into pregnant NOG (NOD/Shi-

Indexed as

adoptive transferCD56+CD39+ dNK subsetM-CSFNOG miceplacental trophoblast cell faterecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID38966071
PMCPMC11223582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.