ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Values of a novel comprehensive prognostic nutritional index (FIDA) in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study focuses on determining the prognostic and predictive value of the comprehensive prognostic nutrition index (FIDA) in individuals undergoing treatment for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC). Methods: This retrospective analysis encompassed 474 of NSCLC patients treated from January 2010 through December 2019. Employing the Lasso-COX regression approach, eight blood parameters were identified as significant prognostic indicators. These parameters contributed to the formulation of the comprehensive prognostic nutrition index FIDA. Utilizing X-tile software, the patient cohort was categorized into either a high or low FIDA group based on an established optimal threshold. The cohort was then randomly segmented into a training set and a validation set using SPSS software. Subsequent steps involved conducting univariate and multivariate regression analyze to develop a prognostic nomogram. The effectiveness of this nomogram was evaluated by calculating the AUC. Results: Analysis of survival curves for both the training and validation sets revealed a poorer prognosis in the high FIDA group compared to the low FIDA group. This trend persisted across various subgroups, including gender, age, and smoking history, with a statistical significance (p<0.05). Time-dependent ROC and diagnostic ROC analyses affirmed that FIDA serves as an effective diagnostic and prognostic marker in NSCLC. Moreover, Cox regression multivariate analysis established FIDA as an independent prognostic factor for NSCLC. The prognostic nomogram, integrating FIDA and clinical data, demonstrated substantial prognostic utility and outperformed the traditional TNM staging systemin predicting overall survival (OS). Conclusion: FIDA emerges as a dependable predictor of outcomes for patients with NSCLC. It offers a practical, cost-effective tool for prognostication in regular clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.