Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966018›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2023

HISTOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES OF KIDNEY TUMORS AND COMPARISON OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL AND PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY AT OSIJEK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CENTER FROM 2017 UNTIL THE END OF 2021.

Bojan Sudarević, Deni Pavoković, Eva Slobođanac

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bojan SudarevićDepartment of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Deni PavokovićDepartment of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Eva SlobođanacFaculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to present results of kidney tumor treatment at Osijek University Hospital Center over a 5-year period and to compare the outcomes between patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN). From November 2016 until the end of 2021, there were 280 consecutive PNs and RNs included in this cross-sectional study. Exclusion criteria were nephrectomies due to non-oncologic reasons and transitional cell carcinoma. There were 229 RNs and 51 PNs, median age of all patients was 62.5 (range 34-84) years. In the RN group, there were 197 renal cell carcinomas (RCC), predominantly clear-cell subtype, while among others there were 8 multilocular cystic renal neoplasms of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP) and 6 oncocytomas and angiomyolipomas each. There were 44 RCCs, 4 oncocytomas, 1 MCRNLMP and 2 cysts removed with PN; median R.E.N.A.L. score was 5. RN group had greater tumor diameters and higher tumor grade, higher postoperative creatinine levels and complications of higher grade. There was no difference in median hospital stay (6 days) and follow-up (20 months). With regard to oncologic safety, preservation of kidney function and lower overall morbidity, PN should be preferred to RN whenever oncologically safe and technically feasible.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedKidney neoplasmsNephrectomyRenal insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID38966018
PMCPMC11221236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.