Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38966013›Full record

ReviewActa clinica Croatica2023

THE ROLE OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGISTS IN THE TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS IN UROLOGIC PATIENTS.

Vjekoslav Kopačin, Tajana Turk, Oliver Pavlović, Josip Perković, Vinko Krajina, Deni Pavoković

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta clinica Croatica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vjekoslav KopačinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osijek University Hospital Center. Osijek, Croatia.
Tajana TurkDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osijek University Hospital Center. Osijek, Croatia.
Oliver PavlovićDepartment of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Josip PerkovićDepartment of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Vinko KrajinaDepartment of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.
Deni PavokovićDepartment of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center, Osijek, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher turnaround of urologic patients in the tertiary clinical center can lead to more accompanying complications, ranging from 1% to 55% for various procedures, with the incidence of vascular injuries varying from 0.43% up to 9.5%. In patients with impaired renal function, it is imperative to prevent the loss of normal kidney function and potential hemodialysis. Being minimally invasive, endovascular procedures such as renal artery embolization (RAE) can treat major and life-threatening complications, but good and prompt communication between urologists and interventional radiologist is necessary for fast and effective treatment. Absolute contraindications for RAE are the presence of acute infection and previously known anaphylactic reaction to the iodine contrast media, while previous mild or moderate allergic reactions to iodine contrast media are not contraindications for RAE. Currently used embolic agents can be divided into temporary and permanent embolization agents. While the temporary embolization agent available is a gelatin sponge that could be used as complementary material or stand-alone, for permanent embolization interventional radiologists use microparticles, microspheres, liquid embolic agents, coils, and microcoils. RAE procedures are considered to be safe with a low incidence of complications, with non-target embolization being the most serious one. Postembolization syndrome is considered to be the most common adverse effect and it involves around 90% of patients. The overall results show that RAE is a safe, minimally invasive procedure that can effectively treat significant complications caused by other urologic procedures, with the reported success rates of 87%-100%.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticHumansPhysician's RoleRadiography, InterventionalRadiology, InterventionalRenal ArteryUrologic DiseasesEndovascular proceduresIatrogenic kidney injuriesRenal artery embolizationUrologic procedures, complications

Identifiers

PMID38966013
PMCPMC11221225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.