Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965978›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2024

Women's preferences for HIV prevention service delivery in pharmacies during pregnancy in Western Kenya: a discrete choice experiment.

Melissa Latigo Mugambi, Ben O Odhiambo, Annabell Dollah, Mary M Marwa, Judith Nyakina, John Kinuthia, Jared M Baeten, Bryan J Weiner, Grace John-Stewart, Ruanne Vanessa Barnabas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melissa Latigo MugambiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-5528
Ben O OdhiamboDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Annabell DollahUW-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mary M MarwaKenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-1282
Judith NyakinaUW-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
John KinuthiaDepartment of Research and Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jared M BaetenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8242-8438
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Grace John-StewartDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ruanne Vanessa BarnabasHarvard Medical School and Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brett HauberThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

The design and evaluation of strategies to implement HIV prevention interventions for pregnant women in community pharmacy settingsK01MH122326 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUGAMBI, MELISSA · 2021 to 2024
$582k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH122326NIMH NIH HHS K01MH122326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPharmacy-delivered HIV prevention services might create more options for pregnant women to use HIV prevention tools earlier and more consistently during pregnancy. We quantified preferences for attributes of potential HIV prevention services among women of childbearing age in Western Kenya.

methodsFrom June to November 2023, we administered a face-to-face discrete choice experiment survey to women aged 15-44 in Kenya's Homa Bay, Kisumu and Siaya counties. The survey evaluated preferences for HIV prevention services, described by seven attributes: service location, travel time, type of HIV test, sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, partner HIV testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and service fee. Participants answered a series of 12-choice questions. Each question asked them to select one of two service options or no services-an opt-out option. We used hierarchical Bayesian modelling levels to estimate each attribute level's coefficient and understand how attributes influenced service choice.

resultsOverall, 599 participants completed the survey, among whom the median age was 23 years (IQR: 18-27); 33% were married, 20% had a job and worked regularly, and 52% had been pregnant before. Participants, on average, strongly preferred having any HIV prevention service option over none (opt-out preference weight: -5.84 [95% CI: -5.97, -5.72]). The most important attributes were the availability of PrEP (relative importance 27.04% [95% CI: 25.98%, 28.11%]), followed by STI testing (relative importance 20.26% [95% CI: 19.52%, 21.01%]) and partner HIV testing (relative importance: 16.35% [95% CI: 15.79%, 16.90%]). While, on average, participants preferred obtaining services at the clinic more than pharmacies, women prioritized the availability of PrEP, STI testing and partner HIV testing more than the location or cost.

conclusionsThese findings suggest the importance of providing comprehensive HIV prevention services and ensuring PrEP, STI testing and partner HIV testing are available. If pharmacies can offer these services, women are likely to access those services at pharmacies even if they prefer clinics.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansKenyaPharmaciesPre-Exposure ProphylaxisPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAfricadifferentiated careHIVHIV preventionpregnant womenwomen

Identifiers

PMID38965978
PMCPMC11224584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.