Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965939›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2025

Differing worldviews: The politics of happiness, meaning, and psychological richness.

Shigehiro Oishi, Hyewon Choi, Youngjae Cha, Samantha Heintzelman, Nicholas R Buttrick, Erin C Westgate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shigehiro OishiDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-960X
Hyewon ChoiDepartment of Sociology, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, South Korea.
Youngjae ChaDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Samantha HeintzelmanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Nicholas R ButtrickDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Erin C WestgateDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

TWCF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/

backgroundConservative ideology, broadly speaking, has been widely linked to greater happiness and meaning in life. Is that true of all forms of a good life? We examined whether a psychologically rich life is associated with political orientation, system justification, and Protestant work ethic, independent of two other traditional forms of a good life: a happy life and a meaningful life.

methodParticipants completed a questionnaire that assessed conservative worldviews and three aspects of well-being (N = 583 in Study 1; N = 348 in Study 2; N = 436 in Study 3; N = 1,217 in Study 4; N = 2,176 in Study 5; N = 516 in Study 6).

resultsHappiness was associated with political conservatism and system justification, and meaning in life was associated with Protestant work ethic. In contrast, zero-order correlations showed that psychological richness was not associated with conservative worldviews. However, when happiness and meaning in life were included in multiple regression models, the nature of the association shifted: Psychological richness was consistently inversely associated with system justification and on average less political conservatism, suggesting that happiness and meaning in life were suppressor variables.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that happiness and meaning in life are associated with conservative ideology, whereas psychological richness is not.

Indexed as

HappinessPersonal SatisfactionPoliticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultconservatismhappinessmeaning in lifepsychological richness

Identifiers

PMID38965939
PMCPMC12053823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.