ReviewClinical endoscopy2025
Role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Esophageal Remodeling in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical and Functional Implications.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic and fluoroscopic balloon dilatation in benign esophageal strictures.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using a Multi-Task U-Net: A Pilot Study.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Eosinophilic esophageal myositis: a comparative study of distinguishing features, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic insights.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The Therapeutic Pipeline for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- When Manometry and Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Disagree: The Current Limitations of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 and Probable Extended Indications of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Review
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Emerging Insights Into Diagnosis and Management.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Endoscopic Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Narrative Review on Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Dynamic Evolution of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease involving inflammation of the esophagus. Endoscopy is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE and shows typical findings, including esophageal edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stenosis. However, studies involving pediatric and adult patients with EoE suggest that even a normally appearing esophagus can be diagnosed as EoE by endoscopic biopsy. Therefore, in patients with suspected EoE, biopsy samples should be obtained from the esophagus regardless of endoscopic appearance. Moreover, follow-up endoscopies with biopsy after therapy initiation are usually recommended to assess response. Although previous reports of endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with EoE have shown diffuse thickening of the esophageal wall, including lamina propria, submucosa, and muscularis propria, its role in EoE remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Endoscopic dilation or bougienage is a safe and effective procedure that can be used in combination with medical and/or dietary elimination therapy in patients with esophageal stricture for the management of dysphagia and to prevent its recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.