ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2024
Liver-specific delivery of spherical DNA frameworks for alleviation of hepatic ischemic reperfusion injury.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on the protective effect and oxidative stress mechanism of rutin against liver injury (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Steering spherical nucleic acids over metabolic organs for improved targeted drug delivery.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Iron chelators loaded on myocardiocyte mitochondria-targeted nanozyme system for treating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mouse models.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA nanostructures have long been developed for biomedical purposes, but their controlled delivery in vivo proposes a major challenge for disease theranostics. We previously reported that DNA nanostructures on the scales of tens and hundreds nanometers showed preferential renal excretion or kidney retention, allowing for sensitive evaluation and effective protection of kidney function, in response to events such as unilateral ureter obstruction or acute kidney injury. Encouraged by the positive results, we redirected our focus to the liver, specifically targeting organs noticeably lacking DNA materials, to explore the interaction between DNA nanostructures and the liver. Through PET imaging, we identified SDF and M13 as DNA nanostructures exhibiting significant accumulation in the liver among numerous candidates. Initially, we investigated and assessed their biodistribution, toxicity, and immunogenicity in healthy mice, establishing the structure-function relationship of DNA nanostructures in the normal murine. Subsequently, we employed a mouse model of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) to validate the nano-bio interactions of SDF and M13 under more challenging pathological conditions. M13 not only exacerbated hepatic oxidative injury but also elevated local apoptosis levels. In contrast, SDF demonstrated remarkable ability to scavenge oxidative responses in the liver, thereby mitigating hepatocyte injury. These compelling results underscore the potential of SDF as a promising therapeutic agent for liver-related conditions. This aimed to elucidate their roles and mechanisms in liver injury, providing a new perspective for the biomedical applications of DNA nanostructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.