Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965499›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2024

The effect of robot-assisted versus standard training on motor function following subacute rehabilitation after ischemic stroke - protocol for a randomised controlled trial nested in a prospective cohort (RoboRehab).

Jon Skovgaard Jensen, Anders Stengaard Sørensen, Christina Kruuse, Helle Hvilsted Nielsen, Cecilie Dollerup Skov, Henrik Boye Jensen, Marion S Buckwalter, Jens Bojsen-Møller, Kate Lykke Lambertsen, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06273475 (The Effect of Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Training on Motor Function Following Subacute Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke - a Randomised Controlled Trial Nested in a Prospective Cohort.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06273475 narecruitingnot on this map

The Effect of Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Training on Motor Function Following Subacute Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke - a Randomised Controlled Trial Nested in a Prospective Cohort.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsStroke, Ischemic StrokeArmsRobot-assisted Training, Standard Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jon Skovgaard JensenOrthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Jskovgaard@health.sdu.dk.
Anders Stengaard SørensenSDU UAS Center, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christina KruuseDepartment of Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries, Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle Hvilsted NielsenNeurobiology Research Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Cecilie Dollerup SkovOrthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik Boye JensenBrain and Nerve Diseases, Department of Regional Health Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
Marion S BuckwalterDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, and, Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jens Bojsen-MøllerResearch Unit of Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics, Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kate Lykke LambertsenNeurobiology Research Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anders Holsgaard-LarsenOrthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody weight unloaded treadmill training has shown limited efficacy in further improving functional capacity after subacute rehabilitation of ischemic stroke patients. Dynamic robot assisted bodyweight unloading is a novel technology that may provide superior training stimuli and continued functional improvements in individuals with residual impairments in the chronic phase after the ischemic insult. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of dynamic robot-assisted versus standard training, initiated 6 months post-stroke, on motor function, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life in stroke-affected individuals still suffering from moderate-to-severe disabilities after subacute rehabilitation.

methodsStroke-affected individuals with moderate to severe disabilities will be recruited into a prospective cohort with measurements at 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-months post-stroke. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be nested in the prospective cohort with measurements pre-intervention (Pre), post-intervention (Post) and at follow-up 6 months following post-intervention testing. The present RCT will be conducted as a multicentre parallel-group superiority of intervention study with assessor-blinding and a stratified block randomisation design. Following pre-intervention testing, participants in the RCT study will be randomised into robot-assisted training (intervention) or standard training (active control). Participants in both groups will train 1:1 with a physiotherapist two times a week for 6 months (groups are matched for time allocated to training). The primary outcome is the between-group difference in change score of Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment from pre-post intervention on the intention-to-treat population. A per-protocol analysis will be conducted analysing the differences in change scores of the participants demonstrating acceptable adherence. A priori sample size calculation allowing the detection of the minimally clinically important between-group difference of 6 points in the primary outcome (standard deviation 6 point, α = 5% and β = 80%) resulted in 34 study participants. Allowing for dropout the study will include 40 participants in total. DISCUSSION: For stroke-affected individuals still suffering from moderate to severe disabilities following subacute standard rehabilitation, training interventions based on dynamic robot-assisted body weight unloading may facilitate an appropriate intensity, volume and task-specificity in training leading to superior functional recovery compared to training without the use of body weight unloading.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. NCT06273475. TRIAL STATUS: Recruiting. Trial identifier: NCT06273475. Registry name: ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of registration on ClinicalTrials.gov: 22/02/2024.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeRoboticsStroke RehabilitationAdultCohort StudiesEquivalence Trials as TopicExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeBody weight unloadingFunctional trainingGait trainingMotor learningNeuroplasticityNeurorehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID38965499
PMCPMC11223295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.