ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Proportion of HIV exposed infants aged 0-6 months that missed nevirapine prophylaxis in Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Sierra Leone's Elimination of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV program, 2024: The need for a Life Stages approach to triple elimination.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Adherence to Nevirapine Prophylaxis and Its Predictors Among HIV-Exposed Infants Aged 0 to 6 months in Western Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study.Sage open pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNevirapine prophylaxis has been found to lower the risk of HIV transmission in breastfed infants. While about 95% of HIV positive pregnant and lactating mothers use Antiretroviral therapy in Uganda, a smaller percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) receive nevirapine (NVP) prophylaxis. This study aimed to determine the proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis and associated factors.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study done using quantitative methods, conducted at Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH). A total of 228 mother-infant pairs were enrolled. The proportion of HEI who missed NVP, maternal, infant and health facility factors associated were determined using a pre-tested questionnaire. Bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression model were used to determine the proportion and factors associated with missing NVP prophylaxis.
resultsThe proportion of HEI who missed NVP prophylaxis was 50/228 (21.9%). Factors significantly associated with HEI missing NVP prophylaxis included delivery from outside government health facilities (AOR = 8.41; P = 0.001), mothers not undergoing PMTCT counselling (AOR = 12.01; P = 0.001), not on ART (AOR = 8.47; P = 0.003) and not having disclosed their HIV status to their partners (AOR = 2.80; P = 0.001). The HEI that missed nevirapine and were HIV positive were 35 (70.0%). The HEI that were HIV infected despite receiving nevirapine prophylaxis were 5 out of 40(12.5%).
conclusionOne in five HEI missed NVP prophylaxis and nearly three quarters of those who missed NVP prophylaxis were HIV infected. Improving uptake of nevirapine by HEI will require interventions that can aid to strengthen PMTCT counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.