Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965365›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2024

Competing interests: digital health and indigenous data sovereignty.

Ashley Cordes, Marieke Bak, Mataroria Lyndon, Maui Hudson, Amelia Fiske, Leo Anthony Celi, Stuart McLennan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Governing the Unbound: SCAI's Role in the Future of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley Cordes *Environmental Studies Program and Department of Data Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Marieke Bak *Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mataroria LyndonCentre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Maui HudsonTe Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Amelia FiskeInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Leo Anthony CeliDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Stuart McLennanInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. stuart.mclennan@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-6253

Funding

Bridge2AI: Patient-Focused Collaborative Hospital Repository Uniting Standards (CHoRUS) for Equitable AIOT2OD032701 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, CLERMONT, GILLES · 2022 to 2025
$24.6M
MUST Data Science Research Hub (MUDSReH) - Democratized Trusted Research Environment (dTRE)U54TW012043 · FIC · MBARARA UNIVERSITY/SCIENCE/ TECHNOLOGY · PI Leo Anthony G Celi, Jessica Elizabeth Haberer · 2021 to 2026
$6.9M
Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
FIC NIH HHS U54 TW012043NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIH HHS OT2 OD032701U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) DS-I Africa U54 TW012043-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health is increasingly promoting open health data. Although this open approach promises a number of benefits, it also leads to tensions with Indigenous data sovereignty movements led by Indigenous peoples around the world who are asserting control over the use of health data as a part of self-determination. Digital health has a role in improving access to services and delivering improved health outcomes for Indigenous communities. However, we argue that in order to be effective and ethical, it is essential that the field engages more with Indigenous peoples´ rights and interests. We discuss challenges and possible improvements for data acquisition, management, analysis, and integration as they pertain to the health of Indigenous communities around the world.

Identifiers

PMID38965365
PMCPMC11224364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.