Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965324›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Multicentric short term and safety study of ineffective esophageal motility patients treated with RefluxStop device.

J Feka, M Saad, N Boyle, M Paireder, I Kristo, E Rieder, R Asari, S F Schoppmann

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Surgical Procedures in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease].Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J FekaDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
M SaadDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
N BoyleDepartment of Surgery, King Edward VII's Hospital, London, UK.
M PairederDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
I KristoDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
E RiederDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
R AsariDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
S F SchoppmannDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Upper-GI Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Sebastian.schoppmann@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) presents a general health problem with a variety of symptoms and an impairment of life quality. Conservative therapies do not offer sufficient symptom relief in up to 30% of patients. Patients who suffer from ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and also GERD may exhibit symptoms ranging from mild to severe. In cases where surgical intervention becomes necessary for this diverse group of patients, it is important to consider the potential occurrence of postoperative dysphagia. RefluxStop is a new alternative anti-reflux surgery potentially reducing postoperative dysphagia rates. In this bicentric tertiary hospital observational study consecutive patients diagnosed with PPI refractory GERD and IEM that received RefluxStop implantation were included. A first safety and efficacy evaluation including clinical examination and GERD-HRQL questionnaire was conducted. 40 patients (25 male and 15 female) were included. 31 patients (77.5%) were on PPI at time of surgery, with mean acid exposure time of 8.14% ± 2.53. The median hospital stay was 3 days. Postoperative QoL improved significantly measured by GERD HRQL total score from 32.83 ± 5.08 to 6.6 ± 3.71 (p < 0.001). A 84% reduction of PPI usage (p < 0.001) was noted. 36 patients (90%) showed gone or improved symptoms and were satisfied at first follow-up. Two severe adverse events need mentioning: one postoperative slipping of the RefluxStop with need of immediate revisional operation on the first postoperative day (Clavien-Dindo Score 3b) and one device migration with no necessary further intervention. RefluxStop device implantation is safe and efficient in the short term follow up in patients with GERD and IEM. Further studies and longer follow-up are necessary to prove long-lasting positive effects.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxQuality of LifeAdultAgedEsophageal Motility DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeDysphagiaGERDHis angle reconstructionRefluxStop

Identifiers

PMID38965324
PMCPMC11224307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.