Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965240›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Non-homologous end joining shapes the genomic rearrangement landscape of chromothripsis from mitotic errors.

Qing Hu, Jose Espejo Valle-Inclán, Rashmi Dahiya, Alison Guyer, Alice Mazzagatti, Elizabeth G Maurais, Justin L Engel, Huiming Lu, Anthony J Davis, Isidro Cortés-Ciriano and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Micronuclei: origins, assays, mechanisms, diseases and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qing HuDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3349-0056
Jose Espejo Valle-InclánEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-5984
Rashmi DahiyaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Alison GuyerDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Alice MazzagattiDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-0446
Elizabeth G MauraisDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Justin L EngelDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2016-3494
Huiming LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Anthony J DavisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-3651
Isidro Cortés-CirianoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2036-494X
Peter LyDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. peter.ly@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-7069

Funding

Genomic Instability from Fragmented Chromosomes in MicronucleiR35GM146610 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Peter Ly · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Mechanisms of Chromosome Shattering from Defective DNA ReplicationR01CA289435 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Peter Ly · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas) RR180050NCI NIH HHS R01 CA289435NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146610U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM146610Welch Foundation I-2071-20210327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitotic errors generate micronuclei entrapping mis-segregated chromosomes, which are susceptible to catastrophic fragmentation through chromothripsis. The reassembly of fragmented chromosomes by error-prone DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair generates diverse genomic rearrangements associated with human diseases. How specific repair pathways recognize and process these lesions remains poorly understood. Here we use CRISPR/Cas9 to systematically inactivate distinct DSB repair pathways and interrogate the rearrangement landscape of fragmented chromosomes. Deletion of canonical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) components substantially reduces complex rearrangements and shifts the rearrangement landscape toward simple alterations without the characteristic patterns of chromothripsis. Following reincorporation into the nucleus, fragmented chromosomes localize within sub-nuclear micronuclei bodies (MN bodies) and undergo ligation by NHEJ within a single cell cycle. In the absence of NHEJ, chromosome fragments are rarely engaged by alternative end-joining or recombination-based mechanisms, resulting in delayed repair kinetics, persistent 53BP1-labeled MN bodies, and cell cycle arrest. Thus, we provide evidence supporting NHEJ as the exclusive DSB repair pathway generating complex rearrangements from mitotic errors.

Indexed as

ChromothripsisCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairMitosisGene RearrangementHumansMicronuclei, Chromosome-DefectiveTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID38965240
PMCPMC11224358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.