Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965209›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2024

Patient-specific computational models predict prognosis in B cell lymphoma by quantifying pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic signatures from genetic sequencing data.

Richard Norris, John Jones, Erika Mancini, Timothy Chevassut, Fabio A Simoes, Chris Pepper, Andrea Pepper, Simon Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multi-omics integrative analyses revealsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational modelling of aggressive B-cell lymphoma.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard NorrisDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
John JonesDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Erika ManciniSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Timothy ChevassutDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Fabio A SimoesDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Chris PepperDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3603-8839
Andrea PepperDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-1280
Simon MitchellDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. S.A.Mitchell@bsms.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1091-6349

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V009095/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic heterogeneity and co-occurring driver mutations impact clinical outcomes in blood cancers, but predicting the emergent effect of co-occurring mutations that impact multiple complex and interacting signalling networks is challenging. Here, we used mathematical models to predict the impact of co-occurring mutations on cellular signalling and cell fates in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Simulations predicted adverse impact on clinical prognosis when combinations of mutations induced both anti-apoptotic (AA) and pro-proliferative (PP) signalling. We integrated patient-specific mutational profiles into personalised lymphoma models, and identified patients characterised by simultaneous upregulation of anti-apoptotic and pro-proliferative (AAPP) signalling in all genomic and cell-of-origin classifications (8-25% of patients). In a discovery cohort and two validation cohorts, patients with upregulation of neither, one (AA or PP), or both (AAPP) signalling states had good, intermediate and poor prognosis respectively. Combining AAPP signalling with genetic or clinical prognostic predictors reliably stratified patients into striking prognostic categories. AAPP patients in poor prognosis genetic clusters had 7.8 months median overall survival, while patients lacking both features had 90% overall survival at 120 months in a validation cohort. Personalised computational models enable identification of novel risk-stratified patient subgroups, providing a valuable tool for future risk-adapted clinical trials.

Indexed as

MutationAgedApoptosisCell ProliferationComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID38965209
PMCPMC11224250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.