Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965191›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Lasso-Cox interpretable model of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma.

Han Li, Chengyuan Zhou, Chenjie Wang, Bo Li, Yanqiong Song, Bo Yang, Yan Zhang, Xueting Li, Mingyue Rao, Jianwen Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Wrangling Real-World Data: Optimizing Clinical Research Through Factor Selection with LASSO Regression.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Han Li *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Chengyuan Zhou *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Chenjie WangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Bo LiDepartment of General Surgery (Hepatobiliary Surgery), The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Yanqiong SongSchool of Medicine, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Bo YangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Xueting LiDepartment of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Mingyue RaoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Jianwen ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Ke SuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China.
Kun HeClinical Medical College, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, China. hktongji@swmu.edu.cn.
Yunwei HanDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan Province, China. lanpaoxiansheng@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-9095

Funding

Luzhou Science and Technology Bureau 2022-JYJ-123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma patients, markers for predicting tumor progression or prognosis are limited. Therefore, our objective is to establish an optimal predicet model for this subset of patients, utilizing interpretable methods to enhance the accuracy of HCC prognosis prediction.

methodsWe recruited a total of 508 AFP-negative HCC patients in this study, modeling with randomly divided training set and validated with validation set. At the same time, 86 patients treated in different time periods were used as internal validation. After comparing the cox model with the random forest model based on Lasso regression, we have chosen the former to build our model. This model has been interpreted with SHAP values and validated using ROC, DCA. Additionally, we have reconfirmed the model's effectiveness by employing an internal validation set of independent periods. Subsequently, we have established a risk stratification system.

resultsThe AUC values of the Lasso-Cox model at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.807, 0.846, and 0.803, and the AUC values of the Lasso-RSF model at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.783, 0.829, and 0.776. Lasso-Cox model was finally used to predict the prognosis of AFP-negative HCC patients in this study. And BCLC stage, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), diameter of tumor, lung metastases (LM), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the number of tumors were included in the model. The validation set and the separate internal validation set both indicate that the model is stable and accurate. Using risk factors to establish risk stratification, we observed that the survival time of the low-risk group, the middle-risk group, and the high-risk group decreased gradually, with significant differences among the three groups.

conclusionThe Lasso-Cox model based on AFP-negative HCC showed good predictive performance for liver cancer. SHAP explained the model for further clinical application.

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAFP protein, humanalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorAFPHepatocellular carcinomaInterpretableMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.