ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Transformers for colorectal cancer segmentation in CT imaging.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal foundation models in colorectal cancer: from prediction to trustworthy clinical insight.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMost recently transformer models became the state of the art in various medical image segmentation tasks and challenges, outperforming most of the conventional deep learning approaches. Picking up on that trend, this study aims at applying various transformer models to the highly challenging task of colorectal cancer (CRC) segmentation in CT imaging and assessing how they hold up to the current state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN), the nnUnet. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the impact of the network size on the resulting accuracies, since transformer models tend to be significantly larger than conventional network architectures.
methodsFor this purpose, six different transformer models, with specific architectural advancements and network sizes were implemented alongside the aforementioned nnUnet and were applied to the CRC segmentation task of the medical segmentation decathlon.
resultsThe best results were achieved with the Swin-UNETR, D-Former, and VT-Unet, each transformer models, with a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.60, 0.59 and 0.59, respectively. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art CNN, the nnUnet could be outperformed by transformer architectures regarding this task. Furthermore, a comparison with the inter-observer variability (IOV) of approx. 0.64 DSC indicates almost expert-level accuracy. The comparatively low IOV emphasizes the complexity and challenge of CRC segmentation, as well as indicating limitations regarding the achievable segmentation accuracy.
conclusionAs a result of this study, transformer models underline their current upward trend in producing state-of-the-art results also for the challenging task of CRC segmentation. However, with ever smaller advances in total accuracies, as demonstrated in this study by the on par performances of multiple network variants, other advantages like efficiency, low computation demands, or ease of adaption to new tasks become more and more relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38965166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.