Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38965166›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Transformers for colorectal cancer segmentation in CT imaging.

Georg Hille, Pavan Tummala, Lena Spitz, Sylvia Saalfeld

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georg HilleDepartment of Simulation and Graphics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. georg.hille@ovgu.de.
Pavan TummalaDepartment of Simulation and Graphics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Lena SpitzDepartment of Simulation and Graphics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sylvia SaalfeldResearch Campus STIMULATE, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13GW0473A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost recently transformer models became the state of the art in various medical image segmentation tasks and challenges, outperforming most of the conventional deep learning approaches. Picking up on that trend, this study aims at applying various transformer models to the highly challenging task of colorectal cancer (CRC) segmentation in CT imaging and assessing how they hold up to the current state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN), the nnUnet. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the impact of the network size on the resulting accuracies, since transformer models tend to be significantly larger than conventional network architectures.

methodsFor this purpose, six different transformer models, with specific architectural advancements and network sizes were implemented alongside the aforementioned nnUnet and were applied to the CRC segmentation task of the medical segmentation decathlon.

resultsThe best results were achieved with the Swin-UNETR, D-Former, and VT-Unet, each transformer models, with a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.60, 0.59 and 0.59, respectively. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art CNN, the nnUnet could be outperformed by transformer architectures regarding this task. Furthermore, a comparison with the inter-observer variability (IOV) of approx. 0.64 DSC indicates almost expert-level accuracy. The comparatively low IOV emphasizes the complexity and challenge of CRC segmentation, as well as indicating limitations regarding the achievable segmentation accuracy.

conclusionAs a result of this study, transformer models underline their current upward trend in producing state-of-the-art results also for the challenging task of CRC segmentation. However, with ever smaller advances in total accuracies, as demonstrated in this study by the on par performances of multiple network variants, other advantages like efficiency, low computation demands, or ease of adaption to new tasks become more and more relevant.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHumansRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedColorectal cancerCT imagingDeep learningMedical segmentation decathlonSegmentationTransformers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.