Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38964949›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2024

Identifying responders to vagus nerve stimulation based on microstructural features of thalamocortical tracts in drug-resistant epilepsy.

Alexandre Berger, Michele Cerra, Vincent Joris, Venethia Danthine, Benoit Macq, Laurence Dricot, Gilles Vandewalle, Nicolas Delinte, Riëm El Tahry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preoperative MEG reveals differential brain network characteristics in drug-resistant epilepsy patients based on vagus nerve stimulation response.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandre BergerEpilepsy and Neurostimulation Lab, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium; Synergia Medical SA, 1435, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium; Sleep and Chronobiology Lab, GIGA-Cyclotron Research Center-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: alexandre.berger@uclouvain.be.
Michele CerraInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Catholic University of Louvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Politecnico di Torino, Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Torino, Italy.
Vincent JorisEpilepsy and Neurostimulation Lab, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (CUSL), Department of Neurosurgery, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Venethia DanthineEpilepsy and Neurostimulation Lab, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Benoit MacqInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Catholic University of Louvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Laurence DricotEpilepsy and Neurostimulation Lab, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Gilles VandewalleSleep and Chronobiology Lab, GIGA-Cyclotron Research Center-In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Nicolas DelinteEpilepsy and Neurostimulation Lab, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics (ICTEAM), Catholic University of Louvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Riëm El TahryEpilepsy and Neurostimulation Lab, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Catholic University of Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Refractory Epilepsy, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (CUSL), Department of Neurology, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms of action of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) and the biological prerequisites to respond to the treatment are currently under investigation. It is hypothesized that thalamocortical tracts play a central role in the antiseizure effects of VNS by disrupting the genesis of pathological activity in the brain. This pilot study explored whether in vivo microstructural features of thalamocortical tracts may differentiate Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) patients responding and not responding to VNS treatment. Eighteen patients with DRE (37.11 ​± ​10.13 years, 10 females), including 11 responders or partial responders and 7 non-responders to VNS, were recruited for this high-gradient multi-shell diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) study. Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and multi-compartment models - Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) and Microstructure Fingerprinting (MF), we extracted microstructural features in 12 subsegments of thalamocortical tracts. These characteristics were compared between responders/partial responders and non-responders. Subsequently, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was built, incorporating microstructural features and 12 clinical covariates (including age, sex, duration of VNS therapy, number of antiseizure medications, benzodiazepine intake, epilepsy duration, epilepsy onset age, epilepsy type - focal or generalized, presence of an epileptic syndrome - no syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, etiology of epilepsy - structural, genetic, viral, or unknown, history of brain surgery, and presence of a brain lesion detected on structural MRI images). Multiple diffusion metrics consistently demonstrated significantly higher white matter fiber integrity in patients with a better response to VNS (p

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingDrug Resistant EpilepsyThalamusVagus Nerve StimulationAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkerEpilepsyMagnetic resonance imagingSupport vector machineThalamocortical tractsVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38964949
PMCPMC11579871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.