Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38963698›Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2024

Assessment of Heat Exposure and Health Outcomes in Rural Populations of Western Kenya by Using Wearable Devices: Observational Case Study.

Ina Matzke, Sophie Huhn, Mara Koch, Martina Anna Maggioni, Stephen Munga, Julius Okoth Muma, Collins Ochieng Odhiambo, Daniel Kwaro, David Obor, Till Bärnighausen and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Using wearable devices to measure personal heat exposure in a preconception cohort.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ina MatzkeHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-9609
Sophie HuhnHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-7156
Mara KochHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-0160
Martina Anna MaggioniCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Physiology, Center for Space Medicine and Extreme Environment, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6319-8566
Stephen MungaCentre for Global Health Research KISUMU, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-7230-7824
Julius Okoth MumaCentre for Global Health Research KISUMU, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0009-0004-8508-7308
Collins Ochieng OdhiamboCentre for Global Health Research KISUMU, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0009-0000-8956-3448
Daniel KwaroCentre for Global Health Research KISUMU, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-0929-8072
David OborCentre for Global Health Research KISUMU, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-2852-6368
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-4212
Peter DambachHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-6866
Sandra BarteitHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3806-6027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change increasingly impacts health, particularly of rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa due to their limited resources for adaptation. Understanding these impacts remains a challenge, as continuous monitoring of vital signs in such populations is limited. Wearable devices (wearables) present a viable approach to studying these impacts on human health in real time.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of consumer-grade wearables in measuring the health impacts of weather exposure on physiological responses (including activity, heart rate, body shell temperature, and sleep) of rural populations in western Kenya and to identify the health impacts associated with the weather exposures.

methodsWe conducted an observational case study in western Kenya by utilizing wearables over a 3-week period to continuously monitor various health metrics such as step count, sleep patterns, heart rate, and body shell temperature. Additionally, a local weather station provided detailed data on environmental conditions such as rainfall and heat, with measurements taken every 15 minutes.

resultsOur cohort comprised 83 participants (42 women and 41 men), with an average age of 33 years. We observed a positive correlation between step count and maximum wet bulb globe temperature (estimate 0.06, SE 0.02; P=.008). Although there was a negative correlation between minimum nighttime temperatures and heat index with sleep duration, these were not statistically significant. No significant correlations were found in other applied models. A cautionary heat index level was recorded on 194 (95.1%) of 204 days. Heavy rainfall (>20 mm/day) occurred on 16 (7.8%) out of 204 days. Despite 10 (21%) out of 47 devices failing, data completeness was high for sleep and step count (mean 82.6%, SD 21.3% and mean 86.1%, SD 18.9%, respectively), but low for heart rate (mean 7%, SD 14%), with adult women showing significantly higher data completeness for heart rate than men (2-sided t test: P=.003; Mann-Whitney U test: P=.001). Body shell temperature data achieved 36.2% (SD 24.5%) completeness.

conclusionsOur study provides a nuanced understanding of the health impacts of weather exposures in rural Kenya. Our study's application of wearables reveals a significant correlation between physical activity levels and high temperature stress, contrasting with other studies suggesting decreased activity in hotter conditions. This discrepancy invites further investigation into the unique socioenvironmental dynamics at play, particularly in sub-Saharan African contexts. Moreover, the nonsignificant trends observed in sleep disruption due to heat expose the need for localized climate change mitigation strategies, considering the vital role of sleep in health. These findings emphasize the need for context-specific research to inform policy and practice in regions susceptible to the adverse health effects of climate change.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureRural PopulationWearable Electronic DevicesAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareAfricaclimateclimate changeenvironmentenvironmentalexposurefitness trackershealthheatKenyaoutcomeoutcomesruralsub-Saharan Africatemperaturetrackertrackerswearablewearablesweather

Identifiers

PMID38963698
PMCPMC11258525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.