Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38963605›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024

Beyond black-box models: explainable AI for embryo ploidy prediction and patient-centric consultation.

Thi-My-Trang Luong, Nguyen-Tuong Ho, Yuh-Ming Hwu, Shyr-Yeu Lin, Jason Yen-Ping Ho, Ruey-Sheng Wang, Yi-Xuan Lee, Shun-Jen Tan, Yi-Rong Lee, Yung-Ling Huang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thi-My-Trang LuongInternational Master Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-7519
Nguyen-Tuong HoTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yuh-Ming HwuTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shyr-Yeu LinTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jason Yen-Ping HoTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ruey-Sheng WangTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Xuan LeeTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shun-Jen TanTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Rong LeeTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yung-Ling HuangTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Ching HsuTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Nguyen-Quoc-Khanh LeAIBioMed Research Group, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. khanhlee@tmu.edu.tw.
Chii-Ruey TzengTaipei Fertility Centre, Taipei, Taiwan. tzengcr@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model enhances the accuracy and transparency of predicting embryo ploidy status based on embryonic characteristics and clinical data.

methodsThis retrospective study utilized a dataset of 1908 blastocyst embryos. The dataset includes ploidy status, morphokinetic features, morphology grades, and 11 clinical variables. Six machine learning (ML) models including Random Forest (RF), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), AdaBoost (ADA), and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LGBM) were trained to predict ploidy status probabilities across three distinct datasets: high-grade embryos (HGE, n = 1107), low-grade embryos (LGE, n = 364), and all-grade embryos (AGE, n = 1471). The model's performance was interpreted using XAI, including SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) techniques.

resultsThe mean maternal age was 38.5 ± 3.85 years. The Random Forest (RF) model exhibited superior performance compared to the other five ML models, achieving an accuracy of 0.749 and an AUC of 0.808 for AGE. In the external test set, the RF model achieved an accuracy of 0.714 and an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI, 0.702-0.796). SHAP's feature impact analysis highlighted that maternal age, paternal age, time to blastocyst (tB), and day 5 morphology grade significantly impacted the predictive model. In addition, LIME offered specific case-ploidy prediction probabilities, revealing the model's assigned values for each variable within a finite range.

conclusionThe model highlights the potential of using XAI algorithms to enhance ploidy prediction, optimize embryo selection as patient-centric consultation, and provides reliability and transparent insights into the decision-making process.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePloidiesAdultBlastocystEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMachine LearningMaternal AgePregnancyPreimplantation DiagnosisReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineEmbryo selectionExplainable artificial intelligenceMachine learningPloidy predictionPreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID38963605
PMCPMC11405599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.