In one paragraphArticle in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Tariel A AtabekovDepartment of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia. kgma1011@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2645-4142 Svetlana I SazonovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-3260 Mikhail S KhlyninLaboratory of High Technologies for Diagnostics and Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9885-5204 Elvira F MuslimovaLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pathology and Gene Diagnostics, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-2161 Sergey N KrivolapovDepartment of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8121-8287 Igor O KurlovDepartment of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2511-6491 Tatiana Yu RebrovaLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pathology and Gene Diagnostics, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-9599 Anna I MishkinaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-1635 Sergey A AfanasievLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pathology and Gene Diagnostics, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-3998 Roman E BatalovLaboratory of High Technologies for Diagnostics and Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-3932 Sergey V PopovAcademician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director, Department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation, Kievskaya st., 111a, Tomsk, 634012, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9050-4493 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
This prospective study aimed to investigate the ability of cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) activity assessment to predict appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during long-term follow-up period. We enrolled patients with CAD and ICD implantation indications that included both secondary and primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Before ICD implantation CANS was assessed by using heart rate variability (HRV), myocardium scintigraphy with
Indexed as
Autonomic Nervous SystemCoronary Artery DiseaseDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockHeart RatePredictive Value of TestsRadiopharmaceuticals3-IodobenzylguanidineAgedClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion Imaging3-IodobenzylguanidineRadiopharmaceuticalsAppropriate ICD therapyCardiac 123I-MIBG scintigraphyCardiac autonomic nervous systemImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390