Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38963543›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2024

Which neonates should have a pre-operative echocardiography? Findings from a national survey and a retrospective tertiary single-centre analysis in the United Kingdom.

Joel W E Chin, Anthony W R Kelsall, Danny Jenkins, Abha Khushu, Daniel Stubbs, Johanne Lynch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joel W E ChinDepartment of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Box: 93, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. joelchin@gmail.com.
Anthony W R KelsallDepartment of Paediatrics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Danny JenkinsUniversity Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham High Street, London, SE13 6LH, UK.
Abha KhushuDepartment of Neonatology, Evelina Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Daniel StubbsDepartment of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Box: 93, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Johanne LynchDepartment of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Box: 93, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) before neonatal surgery is crucial for anaesthetic and perioperative management. There are no established criteria for pre-operative echocardiography in neonates. We aimed to survey current practice in the United Kingdom and evaluate the reliability of antenatal screening and postnatal clinical assessment in detecting CHD before surgery.

methodA 9-point questionnaire was sent to all paediatric surgical centres in the United Kingdom to assess their practice. Subsequently, a single-centre retrospective review of all neonatal surgery over 5 years (2015-2020) was conducted in our tertiary paediatric/neonatal hospital. Data included pre-operative clinical assessment, performance of chest radiograph and echocardiography. Indications for echocardiography were categorised and assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

resultsAll 26 paediatric surgical centres responded to our survey. 23/26 (88.5%) did not have established criteria or guidelines for pre-operative echocardiography. There was a large variation in which surgical conditions required a pre-operative scan and whether a normal clinical examination was considered sufficient to not require one. For the retrospective review, 454 patients were identified. There were 40 cases with CHDs (8.8%), 13 were classed as major or moderate. Indications for echocardiography were categorised into abnormal foetal cardiac screening, medical/surgical conditions associated with CHD and an abnormal cardiorespiratory examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for major and moderate CHD were 46%, 99%, 67%, 98% for abnormal foetal screening, 46%, 97%, 35%, 98% for associated medical conditions, 62%, 66%, 6%, 98% for associated surgical conditions, and 100%, 66%, 9%, 100% for abnormal clinical examination.

conclusionThe use of pre-operative echocardiography in neonates is not standardised across the UK. The results from our cohort demonstrate that foetal echocardiography is not sufficient to capture all major and moderate CHDs, but the absence of abnormal clinical examination is highly reliable in ruling out them out. Specifying a list of medical/surgical of conditions associated with CHD warranting pre-operative echocardiography may improve yield, but this depends on the availability of resources and expertise.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHeart Defects, CongenitalPreoperative CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersUnited KingdomEchocardiographyNeonatePerioperativeSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.