ArticleCureus2024
A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiencies of Different Rotary File Systems in Terms of Remaining Dentin Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of mechanized instrumentation on distal wall thickness of the second mesiobuccal canal.Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL · 2025Article
- Surface integrity assessment of endodontic instruments after repeated use: A microscopic analysis.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the dentin thickness of the mesio-buccal canal of the lower first molar after canal preparation with three different rotary file systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODOLOGY: TruNatomy (Dentsply Sirona, USA), 2Shape (Micro-Mega, France), and One Curve (Micro-Mega, France) were the three different rotary files that were employed. A total of 45 excised human permanent first mandibular molars were divided into Groups A (TruNatomy), B (2Shape), and C (One Curve) at random. To measure the residual dentin thickness at 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the radiographic apex, the mesial root of the tooth was removed from the tooth, and a mesio-buccal canal was taken. Samples were mounted in clear acrylic resin and were subjected to a pre-instrumentation CBCT scan. The mesio-buccal canal was cleaned and shaped while maintaining the final mesio-buccal canal preparation of Group A - 26/0.04, Group B - 25/0.04, and Group C - 25/0.04. The samples were extensively irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA, and a post-instrumentation scan was performed on them. Statistics were used to determine the values from CBCT scans that were recorded for pre- and post-instrumentations.
resultsThe results showed that Group A had the greatest drop in dentin thickness, followed by Group B and Group C. The change in dentin thickness was greatest at 3 mm and 7 mm.
conclusionIn contrast to TruNatomy and 2Shape rotary file systems, One Curve has the advantage of maintaining a tooth's thickness at 3 and 7 millimeters from the radiological apex. Since the TruNatomy file system removes more dentin than the other two combined, it should be used cautiously. Choosing the right instrument is crucial for cleaning and shaping during root canal preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.