ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Cachexia Index Is a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Systemic Chemotherapy.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving systemic chemotherapy: a randomized controlled study.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Preclinical evaluation of rBCG-h12: an engineered Bacillus Calmette-Guérin with an enhanced activity against bladder and pancreatic cancers.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Cancer cachexia is associated with poor prognosis in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The objective of the study was to assess the cachexia index (CXI), which is a new indicator assessing the status of cancer cachexia, as a prognostic indicator for mUC patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: The study included 55 patients with mUC who underwent GC chemotherapy between 2008 and 2022 as first-line chemotherapy. The CXI at the start of chemotherapy was determined as follows: CXI=(serum albumin × skeletal muscle mass index)/ (neutrophil count/lymphocyte count). Patients were categorized into two groups based on a median CXI value (CXI-high and CXI low). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models to assess the association between the CXI and overall survival (OS). Results: At the start of GC chemotherapy, significant differences were not found in patients' characteristics. The median OS was significantly shorter in the CXI-low group [10.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI)=5.1-12.8)] than in the CXI-high group [22.3 months (95% CI=13.6-NA), p<0.05]. Multivariate analysis revealed that low CXI was a predictor of a poor prognosis [hazard ratio (HR)=2.25, 95% CI=1.12-4.52, p<0.05]. Conclusion: CXI might be useful as a prognostic indicator for patients with mUC undergoing first-line GC chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.