ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2024
Estimating prevalence of classical homocystinuria in the United States using Optum's de-identified market clarity data.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recorded ocular diagnoses in adults with homocystinuria: A propensity score-matched cohort study.AJO international · 2026Article
- Homocystinuria in a consanguineous indigenous family from rural Honduras: a ten-year follow up and literature review of familial cases.Archive of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Hemoglobin stability impact on healthcare resource utilization and costs among dialysis-dependent patients with anemia of end-stage kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2025Observational
- Impact of classical homocystinuria on health care resource utilization and costs in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Prevalence estimates for classical homocystinuria (HCU) are variable and likely underestimated due to underdiagnosis. Claims data represent a strong but seldom used resource to analyze prevalence of HCU. The aim of this study was to estimate a prevalence range of HCU in the US utilizing a combination of diagnosis codes, total homocysteine levels, and clinical presentations indicative of HCU. Methods: This was a non-interventional retrospective cohort study, using Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data, with a patient identification period from January 01, 2016, through September 30, 2021. An algorithm was developed to identify 2 cohorts of patients using broad and strict definitions of HCU. The index date was the date within the identification period on which the first criterion was met for the inclusion criteria. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and complications were assessed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Crude and standardized prevalence estimates were calculated. Results: There were 3880 and 633 patients that met the relevant inclusion criteria for the broad and strict cohorts, respectively. The projected US prevalence of HCU was calculated to be 17,631 and 3466 based on the broad and strict definitions, respectively. The average annual standardized prevalence across 2016-2020 was 5.29 and 1.04 per 100,000 people for the broad and strict cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Prevalence estimates of HCU vary depending on databases or datasets used and identification criteria. Many patients with clinical presentations suggesting a diagnosis of HCU did not have an associated diagnosis, potentially indicating underdiagnosis or underreporting. Future research should study alternative methods, such as the identification algorithm in our analysis, to better diagnose and understand the true prevalence of HCU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.