ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Computational identification of ultra-conserved elements in the human genome: a hypothesis on homologous DNA pairing.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing highly conserved fragments in 3'UTRs via statistical and transfer learning approaches.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Non-Random Association of Ultraconserved Genomic Elements (UCE) with Human Genes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thousands of prolonged sequences of human ultra-conserved non-coding elements (UCNEs) share only one common feature: peculiarities in the unique composition of their dinucleotides. Here we investigate whether the numerous weak signals emanating from these dinucleotide arrangements can be used for computational identification of UCNEs within the human genome. For this purpose, we analyzed 4272 UCNE sequences, encompassing 1 393 448 nucleotides, alongside equally sized control samples of randomly selected human genomic sequences. Our research identified nine different features of dinucleotide arrangements that enable differentiation of UCNEs from the rest of the genome. We employed these nine features, implementing three Machine Learning techniques - Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Networks - to classify UCNEs, achieving an accuracy rate of 82-84%, with specific conditions allowing for over 90% accuracy. Notably, the strongest feature for UCNE identification was the frequency ratio between GpC dinucleotides and the sum of GpG and CpC dinucleotides. Additionally, we investigated the entire pool of 31 046 SNPs located within UCNEs for their representation in the ClinVar database, which catalogs human SNPs with known phenotypic effects. The presence of UCNE-associated SNPs in ClinVar aligns with the expectation of a random distribution, emphasizing the enigmatic nature of UCNE phenotypic manifestation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.