Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38962175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2024

A comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals unique signatures to predict Alzheimer's disease.

Michael Vacher, Rodrigo Canovas, Simon M Laws, James D Doecke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adversarial random forests for omics synthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Genetic Burden andJournal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multiomics of Aging and Aging-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Assessing polyomic risk to predict Alzheimer's disease using a machine learning model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael VacherThe Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Kensington, WA, Australia.
Rodrigo CanovasThe Australian eHealth Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Simon M LawsCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
James D DoeckeCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.

Funding

SUPPLEMENT TO RUSH ALZHEIMERS DISEASE CENTER COREP30AG010161 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 1991 to 2020
$49.1M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NEURAL RESERVE AND NEUROBIOLOGY IN AGINGR01AG017917 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 2001 to 2023
$43.3M
RISK FACTORS, PATHOLOGY, AND CLINICAL EXPRESSIONS OF ADR01AG015819 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 1998 to 2024
$21.4M
Discovery of Novel Proteomic Targets in Alzheimer's DiseaseU01AG046161 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN, GESCHWIND, DANIEL H · 2014 to 2018
$8.4M
Genetic Epidemiology of Cognitive Decline in an Aging Population SampleR01AG030146 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI EVANS, DENIS A · 2007 to 2018
$6.2M
Exploring the Role of the Brain Epigenome: Cognitive Decline and Life ExperiencesR01AG036042 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 2009 to 2013
$4.1M
Exploring the Role of the Brain Transcriptome in Cognitive DeclineR01AG036836 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 2011 to 2014
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015819NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017917NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030146NIA NIH HHS R01 AG036042NIA NIH HHS R01 AG036836NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complex disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), result from the combined influence of multiple biological and environmental factors. The integration of high-throughput data from multiple omics platforms can provide system overviews, improving our understanding of complex biological processes underlying human disease. In this study, integrated data from four omics platforms were used to characterise biological signatures of AD. Method: The study cohort consists of 455 participants (Control:148, Cases:307) from the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Genotype (SNP), methylation (CpG), RNA and proteomics data were collected, quality-controlled and pre-processed (SNP = 130; CpG = 83; RNA = 91; Proteomics = 119). Using a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)/AD combined as the target phenotype, we first used Partial Least Squares Regression as an unsupervised classification framework to assess the prediction capabilities for each omics dataset individually. We then used a variation of the sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) to assess predictions of the combined datasets and identify multi-omics signatures characterising each group of participants. Results: Analysing datasets individually we found methylation data provided the best predictions with an accuracy of 0.63 (95%CI = [0.54-0.71]), followed by RNA, 0.61 (95%CI = [0.52-0.69]), SNP, 0.59 (95%CI = [0.51-0.68]) and proteomics, 0.58 (95%CI = [0.51-0.67]). After integration of the four datasets, predictions were dramatically improved with a resulting accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI = [0.89-0.98]). Conclusion: The integration of data from multiple platforms is a powerful approach to explore biological systems and better characterise the biological signatures of AD. The results suggest that integrative methods can identify biomarker panels with improved predictive performance compared to individual platforms alone. Further validation in independent cohorts is required to validate and refine the results presented in this study.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseasebioinformaticsbiomarkers predictionmulti omics analysissystems biology

Identifiers

PMID38962175
PMCPMC11219798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.