ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2024
A comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals unique signatures to predict Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adversarial random forests for omics synthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Trace Elements Dyshomeostasis and Toxic Metals Neurotoxicity in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- Salivary protein macromolecules as diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers linking oral health and neurodegenerative diseases-emerging mechanisms and future perspectives.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Genetic Burden andJournal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Exposome influences: a multi-omics perspective on the combined toxic effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Peptide-Based Therapeutics for Alzheimer's Disease: Medicinal Chemistry, AI-Guided Computational Design, and Blood-Brain Barrier Delivery.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- Uncovering stage-specific neural and molecular progression in Alzheimer's disease: Implications for early screening.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- AD-GCN: A novel graph convolutional network integrating multi-omics data for enhanced Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Multiomics of Aging and Aging-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Saliva Proteome, Metabolome and Microbiome Signatures for Detection of Alzheimer's Disease.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Assessing polyomic risk to predict Alzheimer's disease using a machine learning model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Epigenetics as a link between environmental factors and dementia risk.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Complex disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), result from the combined influence of multiple biological and environmental factors. The integration of high-throughput data from multiple omics platforms can provide system overviews, improving our understanding of complex biological processes underlying human disease. In this study, integrated data from four omics platforms were used to characterise biological signatures of AD. Method: The study cohort consists of 455 participants (Control:148, Cases:307) from the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Genotype (SNP), methylation (CpG), RNA and proteomics data were collected, quality-controlled and pre-processed (SNP = 130; CpG = 83; RNA = 91; Proteomics = 119). Using a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)/AD combined as the target phenotype, we first used Partial Least Squares Regression as an unsupervised classification framework to assess the prediction capabilities for each omics dataset individually. We then used a variation of the sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) to assess predictions of the combined datasets and identify multi-omics signatures characterising each group of participants. Results: Analysing datasets individually we found methylation data provided the best predictions with an accuracy of 0.63 (95%CI = [0.54-0.71]), followed by RNA, 0.61 (95%CI = [0.52-0.69]), SNP, 0.59 (95%CI = [0.51-0.68]) and proteomics, 0.58 (95%CI = [0.51-0.67]). After integration of the four datasets, predictions were dramatically improved with a resulting accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI = [0.89-0.98]). Conclusion: The integration of data from multiple platforms is a powerful approach to explore biological systems and better characterise the biological signatures of AD. The results suggest that integrative methods can identify biomarker panels with improved predictive performance compared to individual platforms alone. Further validation in independent cohorts is required to validate and refine the results presented in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.